The
following is a letter from an L/1 owner to our retail dealer, Audio
By Van Alstine, Inc. It was originally published
in Audio Basics: An Irregular Newsletter of Audio Information,
June 1997, and is reproduced here with permission from the publisher.
|
May 26, 1997
Frank Van Alstine
Audio by Van Alstine
2202 River Hills Drive
Burnsville, MN 55337
RE: Impressions of Biro L/1s
Dear Frank,
I'm writing to you to let you know how delighted I am by the performance
of my Biro L/1s. The longer I have them, the more they amaze me.
As you probably know, they are driven by an AVA 440 watt Omega III
amplifier, Omega III preamplifier, and TOPP-DAC. They rest on heavy,
low-resonance, sand-filled 20" metal stands with small acoustic
footprints, securely connected to the Omega III 440 with heavy gauge
copper wire. The room that houses them has a concrete floor and
four walls of outside construction. Speaker and listener positions
are chosen (by computer analysis and listening tests) to minimize
room resonances. The floor is covered with thick, dense commercial
carpet. Finally, the speakers and stands are nestled in a pair of
Watkins Echo-Muffs devices that surround them on three sides with
four inch thick open-cell polyurethane foam, thus suppressing rear
and side wall reflections. A self-powered, servo-controlled Genesis
subwoofer with a 12-inch Kevlar cone (also positioned using computer
analysis of resonance modes) can be used to supplement the bottom
end.
While the Biros are easy to enjoy, they are difficult to evaluate
critically. Their performance is best characterized by identifying
what they do not do. They simply draw less attention to themselves
than any other speaker I have heard. While this says it all, let
me describe some characteristics that, to my ears, make the Biros
extraordinary.
Their neutrality. The Biro's overall tonal balance is remarkably
close to that of my beloved reference, the Stax Signature headphones
used with the Stax ED-1 (their dedicated equalizer) and is essentially
identical to that of the standard monitors of the classical recording
industry, the B&W 801s (with which I had the opportunity to
compare them in your shop). The Biro's neutrality is most striking
on voice perhaps because human vocal sounds are so familiar. Although
voices sound real only on the best recordings, on the vast majority
of recordings they approach that ideal more closely than any other
speaker I've heard. In fact, when listening to the Biros, I often
have the sense of being able to separate the colorations of the
recording from the inherent character of voices.
Their neutrality is also evident in reproduction of instruments.
Instrumental timbres in most small ensemble recordings and many
carefully-done recordings of larger ensembles are very close to
right. In short, the Biros present as convincing a portrayal of
overall tonal balance as recordings allow.
Their listening ease. As you know, even highly-regarded speakers
often have high-Q (narrow, sharp) peaks in frequency response. At
concert hall levels, sensitive listeners (like those in my family)
often find such speakers painful to listen to a phenomenon my family
calls a speaker's flinch factor. The Biros have no such peaks. Listening
to them at realistic levels, my family is relaxed and comfortable.
As I will discuss below, their comfort is enhanced by their absence
of strain with changing volume levels.
Their pitch definition. As you know, poorly damped speakers allow
transients to excite their resonances, thus muddying reproduction
and imbuing transients with a characteristic similarity. Since music
consists largely of transients, most speakers, by repeatedly imposing
their own resonance signature on music, sing their own songs instead
those they're supposed to reproduce. The popping champagne corks
on track three of Telarc's Ein Straussfest readily reveal this problem.
A few transducers like the Biros communicate the dramatic differences
between these pops. Most, including many highly-regarded transducers,
transform them into similar sonic events.
Since all musical sounds have pitch, pitch definition affects the
accuracy of reproduction of essentially all musical events including
such subtle sounds as the rattle of a snare, the attack of a trumpet
or oboe, the impact a piano's hammer, the pluck of a harpsichord's
quill, the repeated capture and release of a string by a bow, the
consonants of human language and the expressive subtleties of the
human voice. The Biro's pitch definition and thus their intelligibility
are unequaled by any speakers I know.
Their dynamics. While I never heard a recording convincingly portray
the dynamics of unamplified music, I am consistently amazed by the
Biros ability to generate steep, coherent wavefronts the kind that
knock me back in my chair. Some day I may stop chuckling when listening
to Stravinsky's Rite of Spring or Firebird on the Biros. However,
that time is not yet in sight.
Their transparency and detail. The rapidity of the Biros return
to silence in the absence of a signal is stunning. Even in the wake
of the violent wavefronts I alluded to above, the Biros consistently
reveal subtle details. I have never heard their equal in resolution
of the rattle of a snare drum, the subtleties of a vibraphone, or
the separation of instrumental and vocal lines and timbres. I am
consistently amazed by the Biros ability to reveal tonal and expressive
qualities of each individual voice in a choral ensemble and subtleties
of construction, technique, and expression in the instruments of
chamber ensembles I have never heard speakers that approach the
Biro's intelligibility, capacity to resolve detail, or ability to
reveal the elusive, low-level information that places performers
accurately in acoustic spaces.
The integration of their drivers. I am unable to hear any evidence
that the Biros are two-way systems. Treble, midrange and bass frequencies
are reproduced with no audible evidence of separate drivers. The
crossover is entirely seamless; transients in the crossover range
give no evidence of fragmentation; they sing as if reproduced by
one driver. From their lower limit to the highest audible frequencies,
the Biro's neutrality, pitch definition, transparency and detail
are consistent, and consistently superb.
Their imaging. On many recordings, the Biros disappear, leaving
three-dimensional images floating around their end of the room.
This ability seems due, in large part, to characteristics discussed
above; their neutrality, their pitch definition, their transparency
and their detail all help them provide information necessary to
construct convincing models of instruments and acoustic spaces.
However, these virtues would be of little value if my pair of Biros
differed significantly in any of these characteristics. However,
I find myself incapable of hearing differences between the two speakers.
While the Biros quality control has no drawbacks, their detail and
resolution do. The images created by poor recordings (especially
multi-miked recordings designed to compensate for the deficiencies
of low-definition stereo systems) can sound distressingly confusing
on the Biros. And the Biros do little to hide the sins of poorly
designed electronics.
Their bass. Down to their practical limit (as I have set them up,
they are about 3 dB down at 45 Hz.), their distortion, attack, decay,
and pitch definition are superb. While other speakers (like the
801s) go lower and louder, I much prefer the Biro's bass quality.
The Biros, in any case, are far from bass-shy. My subwoofer adds
little but an occasional sense of pressure and fullness. Their smooth,
low rolloff and lack of exaggerated mid-bass (characteristic of
most other small speakers) allow them to blend superbly with my
sub.
Their ability to disappear. The Biros are free of the limitations
of both big and small speakers. Whatever their virtues, big speakers
often suffer from resonances in the large panels from which their
boxes are made (or, in planar speakers, from resonances in their
radiating surfaces and supporting structures), diffraction problems
(due to the large panels on which drivers are mounted), and poor
driver integration due to wide spacing of drivers and complex crossovers.
The Biros, with their small, non-resonant box, closely-spaced drivers,
free-air mounted tweeters, and two-way design, avoid these problems.
Whatever their virtues, small speakers often sound strained at concert
hall levels. As noted above, the Biros have exhibited no sense of
strain at the levels I have listened, and, when challenged, can
generate formidable wavefronts.
What do I wish were different? While I delight in having speakers
that combine almost magical sound with unassuming appearance (and
they blend well with my stands, which add some visual interest),
I sometimes wish they had more visual panache. And while they go
respectably low and play bass very cleanly. (I'm not sure I'd bother
purchasing a subwoofer if I didn't have one), I wouldn't mind if
they went lower. However, I wouldn't sacrifice their sonic virtues
for either of these. The Biros do superbly everything I ask a speaker
to do. If offered the industry standard B&W 801s at the same
price, I would unhesitatingly choose the Biros. They may not go
as low or loud, but, to my ears, even the notoriously clear and
neutral 801s sound colored, resonant, and confused by comparison.
Sincerely,
-Barnet Feingold |
|
Note: Mr. Feingold is the author of
the book, How to Beat the Stereo Rip-Off, published by Geronimo
Press, printed by Small World Press, Inc. 306 North Plum Street, Northfield,
MN 55057, copyright © 1982 by Barnet Feingold.
|